On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Bas van Dijk <v.dijk....@gmail.com> wrote: > The most representative busyWontTimeout benchmark is the interesting > one. Both the old and new score similarly while the event-manager > based timeout is a modest 1.6 x faster. Since this is the most > representative benchmark I'm beginning to favour this implementation.
That's nice, as it is also simpler than 'new'. > Thanks for reading my rambling, Analysis of our core libraries are always great! Thanks, -- Felipe. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
