On Mar 26, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Mario Blažević wrote: > On 11-03-26 04:33 PM, John A. De Goes wrote: > Out of curiosity, have you looked at the monad-coroutine library? It's a > more generic and IMO much cleaner model, though I wouldn't recommend it as a > replacement because the enumerator and iteratee libraries come with more > predefined plumbing. I think your point #1 still stands, but others can all > be made to disappear - as long as you define your suspension functors > properly.
I haven't looked at it. I will take a look. > Do you mean a sort of a transducer monad transformer or an actual finite > state machine? The latter would seem rather restrictive. Yes, I mean transducer monad transformer, especially if you equate "mealy machine" with "finite state machine". I equate mealy machine with "two-taped transducer". Regards, John A. De Goes Twitter: @jdegoes LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/jdegoes _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
