Enumeratees solve some use cases but not others. Let's say you want to incrementally compress a 2 GB file. If you use an enumeratee to do this, your "transformer" iteratee has to do IO. I'd prefer an abstraction to incrementally and purely produce the output from a stream of input.
Regards, John A. De Goes Twitter: @jdegoes LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/jdegoes On Mar 26, 2011, at 3:12 PM, wren ng thornton wrote: > On 3/26/11 4:33 PM, John A. De Goes wrote: >> 4. Iteratees cannot incrementally produce output, it's all or nothing, which >> makes them terrible for many real world problems that require both >> incremental input and incremental output. > > For this one, enumeratees are the proposed solution. But for some reason > enumeratees are oft overlooked. > > -- > Live well, > ~wren > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
