Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 04:08, Michael Snoyman <mich...@snoyman.com> wrote: > > > So one possible solution is to just add an option to never decompress > > response bodies, but that's a bit of a hack. The real question is: > > what's the correct way to handle these tarballs? Web browsers seem to > > know not to decompress them, but AFAICT http-enumerator is correctly > > following the spec by decompressing. Another possibility is to > > > > "Seem to" is pretty much correct; it took years for some browsers to > reliably handle them correctly. (Anyone else remember Mozilla saving > compressed tarballs uncompressed?)
Yes, it was a pain in the neck. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
