On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:06, Paterson, Ross <r.pater...@city.ac.uk> wrote: > Max Rabkin writes: >> But I also have a concrete suggestion for Hackage: include the package >> synopsis on the package's page. The distinction between synopsis and >> description can be confusing, and sometimes it seems to violate DRY to >> have the same info in both. > > You may have missed the header on the package page (dark line at the top).
I did indeed. Perhaps it should be bigger? I've just opened up Synaptic, and it is indeed separate from the description, but there the synopsis is used as a heading for the description, and it's the biggest thing on the screen (whereas Hackage uses package name). > The distinction between synopsis and description is borrowed from the > Debian package format: > > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#s-descriptions > > The two fields are aimed at different audiences. A Synopsis trying to > do double duty as the beginning of a general package description won't > work as well as a stand-alone summary for package lists, etc. Good point. On the other hand, nobody points package authors to the Debian documentation (and Debian also has review for newly uploaded packages, as far as I know). --Max _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
