On 25 October 2011 20:17, Ketil Malde <ke...@malde.org> wrote: > Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Right, but first we need to define what all those terms _mean_... and >> it's no good saying your package is "stable" if you change the API in >> a large-scale fashion every release. > > I think there are better criteria to use, like: > > - do exported definition have Haddock comments? > - does the package have an automated test suite?
What about a test suite that either isn't packaged with the .cabal file or doesn't use Cabal's new test-suite architecture? Does the fact that it _has_ a test suite tell you it's rigorous? -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
