:) I look forward to the ways we all disagree.
I personally worry that a code of conduct still has a crucial weakness, .... HUMANS. interpretation of natural language rules or human behavior always has an ambiguous element, and this is why any sufficiently not sure set of rules *must* have a legal enforcment and judicial infrastructure. (i think Tikhon articulates my perspective on code of conducts way better than I could ) On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 4:42 AM, Henning Thielemann < lemm...@henning-thielemann.de> wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Apr 2017, Simon Peyton Jones via Libraries wrote: > > I’ve been talking to a couple of people about whether it would be useful >> to have an explicit Haskell Community Code of Conduct. Many online >> communities have one (e.g. Rust), and it might be helpful for everyone to >> have a concrete baseline rather than an unwritten standard. Any views on >> that? >> > > I think these Code of Conducts make things even worse because then some > people start to check every word against these codes. Instead I suggest we > make more use of humor. E.g. Carter Schonwald's comment about grumpy people > made me think about renaming my prelude-compat package to grumpy-prelude. > :-) > _______________________________________________ > Libraries mailing list > librar...@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries > >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-community mailing list Haskell-community@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community
