On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 11:06:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >In the present case, people aren't (only) opposing the M-R out of > >principle, but because they actually use overloaded variable definitions > >and (at least sometimes) want to leave off the signature. So I don't > >see how one could claim, as on the wiki, the warning "wouldn't happen > >much". I suspect it would happen, and annoy people, and defeat the > >reason that people want to remove the M-R. > > So I envisage that you'd turn off the warning in the same way as > you turn off the M-R today: by a type signature.
But if people were happy adding type signatures for every polymorphic variable definition, they wouldn't be moving to eliminate the M-R, would they? Or do I misunderstand? Andrew _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list [email protected] http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
