On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Neil Mitchell wrote: > Are standards documents the place for prescribing which warnings > should be raised, and under what circumstances? > > If someone is using GHC, and has specified -O2 then clearly something > that causes vastly more time is a problem. If someone is learning > Haskell and is using Hugs then they probably couldn't care less. > Perhaps some warnings should be left up to the implementation to > decide... >
That's why my preferred phrasing is "warnings available to the user" - that is, they don't have to be on by default but there should be an option to turn them on. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'In Ankh-Morpork even the shit have a street to itself... Truly this is a land of opportunity.' - Detritus, Men at Arms _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list [email protected] http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
