Doaitse Swierstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > '(case x of p -> e, 42)'. > > Where one of course should have written: > (case x of p -> e; , 42) > or even > (case x of p -> e;;, 42)
Hmm? I'm mystified. Are you saying that Simon's example is not valid Haskell'98? Surely the simplest and clearest way to re-write it to avoid the parse-error layout rule is actually: (case x of { p -> e }, 42) Regards, Malcolm _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime