On 2006-05-15, Bulat Ziganshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Aaron, > > Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:27:43 AM, you wrote: > >>> IMHO the right thing is to decouple finalising an FD/AT appendix from >>> finalising the main body of Haskell'. This is clearly more easily >>> realised when the delayed material is out-of-line. > >> Meh. I'd really like a revised numeric prelude to be able to use MPTCs >> with FDs. > > other well-known uses of FDs are also in the heart of core Haskell > libs - collections, monad transformers, streams
Sure, it's just I question how core those are. The math stuff pretty much needs to be built in, especially considering things like defaulting, and syntactic sugar. -- Aaron Denney -><- _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org//mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
