On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 08:36:42AM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> Not allowing infix functions on the LHS would be a notable
> simplification. Constructors in patterns should still be infix of
> course: f (a :=: b) = ...
I don't know, I think this will confuse things, especially for newbies,
people tend to say things like:
a + b = foo
as "a plus b is foo", and so would probably naturally write it in infix
form, it would be a source of confusion if the compiler didn't accept
it.
I don't think saying ~ and ! are operators unless they
1. immediately followed by a '(', a letter, or an underscore
2. are preceded by whitespace or BOL
is that onerous.
John
--
John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
