Am Freitag, 18. April 2008 11:54 schrieb Sittampalam, Ganesh: > Simon Peyton Jones wrote: > > Not allowing infix functions on the LHS would be a notable simplification. > > This would significantly weaken a useful property of Haskell, that > definitions and uses often share the same concrete syntax. It's very natural > to be able to define things that way and it would be a real shame to lose it > (and I think it would break a lot of existing code).
+1 (f . g) x = f (g x) is really nice. > > In any case, I've always thought this was weird: > > Just x == Just y = x == y > > It takes a little getting used to, but I don't find it that weird. +1 > […] Best wishes, Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
