Haskell 2 (whatever it is), does not have the goals that were stated for Haskell', so I can accept disruptive changes.
Haskell' has (had?) some very clear goals, and breaking every existing program was not one of them. On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Wolfgang Jeltsch < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 24. April 2008 09:30 schrieb Lennart Augustsson: > > Haskell has now reached the point where backwards compatibility is > something > > that must be taken very seriously. > > Would you be opposed to a Haskell 2 which would break lots of things? > > > […] > > Best wishes, > Wolfgang > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-prime mailing list > Haskell-prime@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
