On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Niklas Broberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm very suspicious about the power/weight ratio of this change. > > Normally, for simple value-level stuff like this, provide both options: > > > > mapM / forM. =<< >>= > > > > So how about, rather than break things, just provide an alternative to > ($). > > Alright, I'm not sure what the proper channel for doing this is, but I > reckon here is as good as anywhere. I would like to propose that the > Haskell' Prelude includes the function > > f $$ x = f x > > with the same fixity level as $ (presumably 0) but being left > associative instead. And that $ is left as is.
It's a pity that @ isn't available for use as an operator. I've seen it used to represent application in a few places, and its resemblance to an "a" is a handy mnemonic. Is & still free? -- Dave Menendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.eyrie.org/~zednenem/> _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime