Niklas,
In other words, in your 2x3 grid of syntactic x expressiveness, I want
the two points corresponding to classic syntax x {existential
quantification, GADTs} to be removed from the language. My second
semi-proposal also makes each of the three points corresponding to the
new cool syntax a separate extension.
I see, but why are you opposed to have the classic syntax still
support existentials (though foralls) and GADTs (through equality
constraints). I would make sense to me to keep this support around.
Cheers,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
