On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 08:24:52PM +0200, Daniel Fischer wrote: > > If it's considered to be a small enough change so a libraries proposal > would be sufficient, all the better, but if not, I'd like to pursue the > haskell-prime process further.
My understanding is that for changes to libraries mentioned in the language report, we use the libraries@ process, not the H' process. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
