Hello!
On Sun, Sep 13, 1998 at 11:13:35PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> [...]
> The plan is to use something like
> data Integer = Small Int# | Big { ... }
> where '...' is the GMP representation. You then need a full set of
> [...]
Sounds fine. Just a question, will there remain an Int type (machine Ints,
boxed, w/o overflow checks) in addition to the new Integer implementation,
for those who explicitly declare something as Int to squeeze out the last
few cycles?
If yes, I think switching the default for Integral from Int to Integer
is a good thing :-)
Regards, Felix.
- Re: Int vs Integer Will Partain
- Re: Int vs Integer Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: Int vs Integer Will Partain
- Re: Int vs Integer Carl R. Witty
- Re: Int vs Integer Sigbjorn Finne
- Re: Int vs Integer Carl R. Witty
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Int vs Integer S.D.Mechveliani
- Re: Int vs Integer Simon Marlow
- Re: Int vs Integer Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: Int vs Integer Felix Schroeter
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Sigbjorn Finne
- Re: Int vs Integer Jan Skibinski
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Jan Skibinski
- Re: Int vs Integer Stefan Monnier
- Re: Int vs Integer Simon Marlow
- Re: Int vs Integer Keith S. Wansbrough
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
