> At 14:36 -0500 98/10/09, Jan Skibinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could Haskell ever be used for serious scientific computing?
...
>On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Hans Aberg wrote:
> I think you need to define "scientific computing": At 09:57 -0500
>98/10/14,
Jan Skibinski wrote:
> I do not think it is possible to clearly define the phrase.
> It may mean different things to different people.
Specifically, I think one would need to specify some different
categories, each with a well-focused computing profile. Each category may
then require a different set of solutions.
Hans Aberg
* Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/>
* AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>
- Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Haskell in Scientific Computing? Steve Stevenson
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Chris Angus
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Matthew Donadio
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jeffrey R. Lewis
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Simon Peyton-Jones
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Thorsten Zoerner
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Dave Tweed
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? David Barton
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Olivier . Lefevre
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Matthew Donadio
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Dave Tweed
