At 02:30 -0700 98/10/16, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
>Another approach is to compete not head-to-head on speed, but on
>cunning. Get a good library of numeric procedures (e.g. Mathlab), ...
Note that it is "MatLab", short for "Matrix Laboratory".
>...interface them to Haskell, and use Haskell as the glue code to make
>it really fast to write complex numerical algorithms. 99% of the
>time will still be spent in the library, so the speed of the Haskell
>implementation is not very important. This looks like a jolly productive
>line to me.
In addition, this method might give clues on how Haskell might be extended.
Hans Aberg
* Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/>
* AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Matthew Donadio
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jeffrey R. Lewis
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Simon Peyton-Jones
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Thorsten Zoerner
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Dave Tweed
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? David Barton
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Olivier . Lefevre
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Matthew Donadio
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Dave Tweed
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? R.S. Nikhil
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Rod Price
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jeremy D. Frens
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Alex Ferguson
