At 09:49 -0600 1998/11/24, Jan Skibinski wrote:
>> Since modern CPU's are developed as to make more commonly used assembler
>> instructions faster, the only way to find out the speed of the components
>> of a program is to use a profiler.
>>
> Looks like you missed my last question:
> "Is there any profiling tool available for the interpreter?"
> I meant: "for Hugs" but if HBI has some I would gladly
> use it.
This is what I meant, too: A profiler for Hugs that allows one to check the
time of the Haskell program components it interprets. What did you think I
meant?
Hans Aberg
* Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/>
* AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>
- Reduction count as efficiency measure? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Lennart Augustsson
- RE: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Mark P Jones
- RE: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Jan Skibinski
- RE: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Hans Aberg
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Jan Skibinski
- RE: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Hans Aberg
- RE: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Fergus Henderson
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Graeme Moss
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Graeme Moss
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Keith Wansbrough
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Carl R. Witty
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Amr A Sabry
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Ralf Hinze
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Carl R. Witty
