On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Erik Meijer wrote: > > Whatever happened to the auto-import of java classes? > > That's what I am supposed to be working on while Sigbjorn is enjoying > the fjords. We have a nasty bug having to do with the (what we thought > as) clever way of representing JNI objects in Haskell. There is an > elegant solution using implicit arguments, but alas that is only > supported by Hugs :-) Last I heard (a while ago), there were issues with name mangling (to handle java overloading semantics). I suggested to Sigbjorn that MPTC would reduce name mangling to: <class-name>_<method-name>_<method-arity>, but I was not sure whether the HDirect spec mandated support of Haskell98. Then I never heard back. What are implicit arguments? Do they mean that you can even avoid explicityly specifying arity? That would be elegant indeed! -Alex- ___________________________________________________________________ S. Alexander Jacobson Shop.Com 1-212-697-0184 voice The Easiest Way To Shop
Re: Licenses and Libraries
S. Alexander Jacobson Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:46:33 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
- Re: Licenses and Libraries Erik Meijer
- Re: Licenses and Libraries Erik Meijer
- Re: Licenses and Libraries Paul Hudak
- RE: Licenses and Libraries Mark P Jones
- Re: Licenses and Libraries S. Alexander Jacobson
- Re: Licenses and Libraries Ted Carroll
- Re: Licenses and Libraries S. Alexander Jacobson
- Re: Licenses and Libraries Erik Meijer
- Re: Licenses and Libraries Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Licenses and Libraries Jan Skibinski
- Re: Licenses and Libraries Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Licenses and Libraries Daan Leijen
- Re: Licenses and Libraries Mr. Laszlo Nemeth
- Re: Licenses and Libraries Keith Wansbrough
- Re: Licenses and Libraries Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Licenses and Libraries Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Licenses and Libraries Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk