On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 09:44:34AM +0200, Bjorn Lisper wrote: > Sisal was an attempt to define precisely such a functional language. ... > no higher order functions Uhh... have I misunderstood what functional programming is? Isn't higher-order function support a necessary part of every FP language? -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%% "" (John Cage)
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ S.D.Mechveliani
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ George Russell
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ D. Tweed
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Jan Skibinski
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Bjorn Lisper
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Will Partain
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Bjorn Lisper
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Pieter Koopman
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ R.S. Nikhil
- RE: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ John Atwood
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Fergus Henderson