Manuel M. T. Chakravarty wrote: > > Bart Demoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > > Speed is not the only issue - feasability is an issue as well. > > I completely agree, but the original poster did not complain > about a slight discrepancy in speed, he was puzzled about an > unacceptable large gap of several orders of magnitude. > Speed is not the only issue, but it definitely is _an_ issue. Another issue is correctness. What can be said about the correctness of the C++ program? the haskell program? What theorems do we get for free with this haskell program? John Atwood
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Bjorn Lisper
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Will Partain
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Bjorn Lisper
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Pieter Koopman
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ R.S. Nikhil
- RE: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ John Atwood
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Fergus Henderson