Karlsson Kent - keka wrote:
> ?????? Let me for a moment assume that I haven't completely
> lost my mind... (which I might have...)
No, I don't think you've lost your mind; indeed I agree with everything you
say.
(ASCII art clipped). I would write that as something like
X
X
X
X
(and so on.)
> (+ means representable argument value; note the varying
> resolution in "y", which is MUCH higher than in "x")
>
> If the argument reduction is not done properly, the
> result may of course be different...
Yes, that's the sort of thing I'm worried about.
