Re: Fw: speed of compiled Haskell code.

[Ketil Malde]

"Jan Brosius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> NO, NO and NO , please read only what I have written. 

You mean, apart from

>>> This seems that Haskell cannot be considered as a language for real
>>> world applications but merely as a toy for researchers .

?  I could have sworn you were saying here that Haskell was unsuitable
for "real" work, due to the cited performance loss of factor of 6-10. 

My point was that there's plenty of work being done in languages a lot 
slower than Haskell.  There may be reasons for not using Haskell in
the "real" world, performance is IMHO not an important one.

-kzm
-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants