Jan Brosius writes: > Recent (really recent ) benchmarks are not available ont the > Haskell website as far as I know Yes, it would be nice to see some recent benchmarks and interlanguage comparisons reported in an article. The pseudoknot article is already very outdated, and Clean in particular seems to have advanced by leaps and bounds. Of course I realize it was somewhat miraculous that you were able to get so many different language implementation teams to cooperate on pseudoknot, but even just a comparison among the major Haskell compilers, SML/NJ, Ocaml and Clean would be informative. -- Frank Atanassow, Dept. of Computer Science, Utrecht University Padualaan 14, PO Box 80.089, 3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands Tel +31 (030) 253-1012, Fax +31 (030) 251-3791
- RE: speed of compiled Haskell code. Peter Douglass
- RE: speed of compiled Haskell code. Peter Douglass
- RE: speed of compiled Haskell code. Jan Brosius
- RE: speed of compiled Haskell code. Ch. A. Herrmann
- Fw: speed of compiled Haskell code. Jan Brosius
- Re: Fw: speed of compiled Haskell code. Ketil Malde
- Re: Fw: speed of compiled Haskell code. Frank Atanassow
- Re: Fw: speed of compiled Haskell code. Ketil Malde
- Fw: speed of compiled Haskell code. Jan Brosius
- Re: Fw: speed of compiled Haskell code. Jan de Wit
- Re: Fw: speed of compiled Haskell code. Sven Panne
- == and hyperstrictness Fergus Henderson
- Re: == and hyperstrictness Qrczak
- Re: == and hyperstrictness Fergus Henderson
- Re: == and hyperstrictness Frank Atanassow
- Re: == and hyperstrictness Qrczak
- Re: == and hyperstrictness Bjorn Lisper