On Wed, 17 May 2000, Dave Tweed wrote: > [forall x.prime(x)] -||- [forall x.prime(x)] > > ie, a tautology. ^^^^^^^^^^^ Sorry, I really shouldn't email until _after_ my first cup of coffee... I meant `trivially a correct statement about the logic', not tautology which has a more precise meaning in logic than everyday language. ___cheers,_dave________________________________________________________ www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~tweed/pi.htm|I shoulda realised building the email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |memory allocation subsytem with work tel: (0117) 954-5253 |--with-malicious-ai was a bad idea.
- Re: more detailed explanation about forall in Ha... Lars Lundgren
- Re: more detailed explanation about forall in Ha... Jan Brosius
- Re: more detailed explanation about forall ... Jon Fairbairn
- Re: more detailed explanation about forall in Ha... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: more detailed explanation about forall ... Jan Brosius
- Fw: more detailed explanation about forall in Ha... Jan Brosius
- Re: Fw: more detailed explanation about forall i... Carl R. Witty
- Re: more detailed explanation about forall in Ha... Lars Lundgren
- Re: more detailed explanation about forall ... Jan Brosius
- Re: Fw: more detailed explanation about forall i... Dave Tweed
- Fw: more detailed explanation about forall in Ha... Frank Atanassow
- Fw: more detailed explanation about forall in Ha... Frank Atanassow
- Re: more detailed explanation about forall ... Jan Brosius
- Re: more detailed explanation about forall in Ha... Jan Brosius
- Fw: Fw: more detailed explanation about forall i... Jan Brosius
- Re: more detailed explanation about forall in Ha... Frank Atanassow
- Re: more detailed explanation about forall in Ha... Jan Brosius
- RE: more detailed explanation about forall in Ha... Mark P Jones
- Re: more detailed explanation about forall ... Claus Reinke
- Re: more detailed explanation about forall in Ha... Lennart Augustsson
