Koen Claessen wrote:

> But if you find that the Hawk way is interesting to do these
> kind of things, take a look at Lava as well. Lava has
> recently gotten a major rewrite (no monads left!), ...

I'm interested to know the rationale behind removing the monads.  My
admittedly small experience with Haskell has led me to avoid monads when the
same can be achieved with "pure" functions, and for much of the same reasons
that I find imperative programming ugly.  But other people seem to love
them!
--PeterD 

Reply via email to