Sun, 21 May 2000 11:53:39 +0400 (MSD), S.D.Mechveliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> The economy of names is more important.
Convenience of programming is important too. Many Prelude functions
are unnecessary, but are convenient. (++) and concat are not needed
(you can write flip (foldr (:)) for (++) and foldr (++) [] for concat).
It does not mean that one of them or both should be removed.
[qrczak ~/src/ghc-4.07/ghc/compiler]$ find -name '*.lhs' | xargs egrep ' (min|max)
|`(min|max)`' | less
16 occurences are calls to min and max.
[qrczak ~/src/ghc-4.07/ghc/compiler]$ find -name '*.lhs' | xargs egrep ' (min|max)imum
' | less
Only 1 occurence.
I am more happy with standard Prelude.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/ GCS/M d- s+:-- a23 C+++$ UL++>++++$ P+++ L++>++++$ E-
^^ W++ N+++ o? K? w(---) O? M- V? PS-- PE++ Y? PGP+ t
QRCZAK 5? X- R tv-- b+>++ DI D- G+ e>++++ h! r--%>++ y-
