Re: mode for standard functions

[Lennart Augustsson]

Matt Harden wrote:

> "S.D.Mechveliani" wrote:
> >
> > More example on standard functions needing the *mode*:
> > in                                               quotRem, quot, rem,
> >                                                  divMod,  div,  mod.
> >
> ... blather about adding a "Char" argument to standard functions ...
> ...
> To the haskell list: please don't let it appear that you accept this by
> failing speak out against it!

Don't worry, it will never happen.  It's too ugly. :)


--

        -- Lennart