I mumbled: > > This is not a legal type expression, since Tree is a > type constructor, not a ground type, so you cannot apply it to the list > constructor. The other way round, of course: you cannot apply the list constructor to it. - Andreas -- Andreas Rossberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: be declarative. be functional. just be. :: _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
- class instance with nested types Matthias Höchsmann
- Re: class instance with nested types Lars Lundgren
- Re: class instance with nested types Matthias Höchsmann
- Re: class instance with nested types Andreas Rossberg
- Andreas Rossberg