> That's a good idea too.
> Is there a reason for defining acosh as above instead of
> acosh x = log(x + sqrt(x*x-1))
If there is one I can't remember it. :-)

        -- Lennart

_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Reply via email to