> > Thus, the only possible lexical interpretation is the one you first > > suggested, namely a constructor "A" followed by a three-dot operator > > "...".
> A... should be split into "A.." and "."
I found a compromise: let's make it a lexing error! :-)
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
