On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Wolfgang Jeltsch <g9ks1...@acme.softbase.org> wrote: > Am Freitag, 6. März 2009 17:31 schrieben Sie: >> What name would you suggest? > > If we wouldn’t have to care about compatibility, I would name the class String > and drop the type alias String. > > It’s hard to come up with a good name since String is already taken. However, > things like StringLike, Stringy, Chars etc. are probable still better than > IsString since they describe the things (values of instances of that class) > instead of stating a property of them.
How about CharSequence? -- Dave Menendez <d...@zednenem.com> <http://www.eyrie.org/~zednenem/> _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
