2009/3/6 David Menendez <d...@zednenem.com>: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Wolfgang Jeltsch > <g9ks1...@acme.softbase.org> wrote: >> Am Freitag, 6. März 2009 17:31 schrieben Sie: >>> What name would you suggest? >> >> If we wouldn’t have to care about compatibility, I would name the class >> String >> and drop the type alias String. >> >> It’s hard to come up with a good name since String is already taken. However, >> things like StringLike, Stringy, Chars etc. are probable still better than >> IsString since they describe the things (values of instances of that class) >> instead of stating a property of them. > > How about CharSequence?
Characters ? _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
