On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 05:45:34PM +0200, Juerd wrote: > Matthew Garrett skribis 2005-10-17 16:44 (+0100): > > U+0027 is sufficiently overloaded with a large number of historical > > meanings that it's preferable to use a more precise Unicode code point > > wherever possible. > > U+2019, having two very different uses, isn't quite more precise.
It does at least have the advantage that you know it's going to look curly. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
