On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 05:54:15AM -0500, Peter da Silva wrote: > The next response was "well, why do you want to?". Because it's > something I was accustomed to doing, because every other OS (even > ones that conventional wisdom derided for being buggy and unstable, > like AmigaOS) could handle just fine. Even Windows 95 was more stable > and reliable than any pre-Rhapsody OS with an Apple logo on it.
Quite. How ever pretty and internally-consistant the UI, much of the underlying OS was on a technical par with Windows 3, long after Windows 3 was dead. -- Bruce What would Edward Woodward do?
