[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12707691#action_12707691
]
Erik Holstad commented on HBASE-1304:
-------------------------------------
@Stack
Thanks for all the comments.
About Bytes vs ImmutableBytesWritable, I totally forgot about Immutable, we can
use that instead , the only thing is that the name is so long :) The place
where this is used is when we building lists on the server from the KeyValues
that we are looking at and don't want to copy. But it might be a good idea to
keep Bytes as a clean util class, or not, but it doesn't really matter.
What we are doing now is that Jon is restructuring my code and I'm doing
testing on it as we go, So to answer your question, no it doesn't work as it
is right now, I'm still testing it. Puts are already done and are not that
complicated, Deletes a little bit more complex but also done, but are maybe
going to see rewrite. So what we have left to do is scanners and then
compactions.
I think that we should have a version up and running at the end of next week,
then we need to put the old client side methods back in there that uses the new
api, but that should be too bad.
> New client server implementation of how gets and puts are handled.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-1304
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1304
> Project: Hadoop HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.20.0
> Reporter: Erik Holstad
> Assignee: Jonathan Gray
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.20.0
>
> Attachments: hbase-1304-v1.patch, HBASE-1304-v2.patch,
> HBASE-1304-v3.patch
>
>
> Creating an issue where the implementation of the new client and server will
> go. Leaving HBASE-1249 as a discussion forum and will put code and patches
> here.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
