Paul Anderson wrote: > On 11/3/06, Adam Chlipala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm proposing that we discontinue all shared support for Subversion >> serving. Letting members run programs anonymously is too huge a >> security hole, as evidenced by a past break-in (before we banned >> www-data execution) that left us with an extra $100 bandwidth bill that >> we had no idea who to charge to for weeks. >> >> > svnserve might be helpful: > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.serverconfig.svnserve.html > > It appears svnserve can be run in tunnel mode, using -t, and it can > tunnel over an ssh connection. In this configuration, it will be run > as the owner of the repository. There are other capabilities it has > that may be useful, although I've not yet fully explored them. > > This is true - svnserve can run in tunnel mode over ssh, and also as a standalone non-http server (port 3690 is the default port). personally I like to run it under http because I noticed that my download was much slower over svn:// protocol, probably due to traffic shaping at rush hour on my ISP.
an alternative solution is to run a local apache as yourself, and proxy to it from the shared one. _______________________________________________ HCoop-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
