[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I know Brian H. and I both requested SVN in the past. I am not using it > at the moment. I don't think Brian is either. Is anyone actively using > an SVN repo hosted on HCoop? > I am, with a proxy.
> I have to agree that the svnserve isn't the most ideal way to use SVN but > I don't like the idea of there being a security hole. I think we should > stop using the SVN related apache modules if it is a security risk. > I agree that we cannot afford to have this security hole. if someone needs svn, there are a few alternatives that does not involved the primary apache using svn modules: 1. svnserve 2. personal apache. 3. tunneled ssh (never tried it) I am using the second option, because I had some issues that I couldn't live with when using svnserve, and the third is out of question because I want anonymous access. _______________________________________________ HCoop-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
