Was the choice made? ;) I don't remember talking about it and have the feeling we might have just stuck with something that has worked for a long time. The only problem that I could see with lighthttpd is that I don't know about compatibility with existing applications, both for administration (domtool) and users' sites and it might be a hassle to install for this reason. However, perhaps this isn't an issue with the way that we're currently running things.
Maybe in the migration it wouldn't be a bad idea to try using lighthttpd or something else (I've heard some good things about lighthttpd), but I don't have any first-hand experience with servers besides apache personally and for that reason can't comment any further. At any rate, I don't think it's a silly question and perhaps we could at least begin to discuss it as a future platform. Justin Dmitriy Morozov wrote: > Since I joined only recently, and purely out of curiosity (to advance > my own understanding of how things work), I would like to ask a > question that you might find silly. Nonetheless: how (and why) was the > choice of using Apache as the webserver made? (as opposed to say > lighttpd or anything else?) > > Thanks. > Dmitriy > > _______________________________________________ > HCoop-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-discuss > _______________________________________________ HCoop-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
