[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Maybe in the migration it wouldn't be a bad idea to try using > lighthttpd or something else (I've heard some good things about > lighthttpd), but I don't have any first-hand experience with servers > besides apache personally and for that reason can't comment any > further.
I used to have lighttpd running on my work machine, but it was incapable of serving files for a Red Hat Enterprise Linux installation over the network -- I would continually be getting timeouts and 404s. Switching back to apache2 made the problems go away. I would definitely oppose making lighttpd the default http server for hcoop. -- Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/ Interests: Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net /` |\ | | | Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, Planner, ErBot, DVC |_] | \| |_| Reclaim your digital rights by eliminating DRM. See http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm for details.
pgpjY2oNnE0rD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ HCoop-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
