On 26 Mar 07, at 21:09, Adam Chlipala wrote: > We seem to have agreed to change the time period to 48 hours, but that > doesn't change things much.
On the contrary, 48 hours (assuming this excludes holidays and weekends) is much more palatable. :) > It's important to understand that no one is required to do anything > but > respond to e-mails addressed to him personally within that time > period. > If something is broken and that person is asked to fix it, we have not > codified any responsibility on his part to do so... EVER. We only ask > that he respond to the e-mail, so that everyone else can have some > idea > of what's going on. A valid response is "I'm busy this week. I'll do > it on <specific date>." > > I can't, as president, organize people who can't commit to doing that > within 48 hours. If that rules some people out from volunteering, > then > that's too bad, but I don't think there's any alternative. We need to > be able to predict some element of the timing of communication. That's reasonable. Graham _______________________________________________ HCoop-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
