Adam Chlipala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do y'all think we should handle reverse DNS for our new servers? > We can have Peer 1's servers handle the requests by giving them the > individual mappings, or we can ask for a delegation to our DNS > servers. Acting alone, I would choose the first option now, because > we don't expect to change the mappings often, and why _not_ get their > servers to handle the traffic, right? > > In any case, let me see if I've correctly understood which IP > addresses deserve reverse-resolvable names. We have deleuze (main > server), mire (member dynamic content server), and baltar (switch), > each of which already has a hcoop.net forward mapping (with DNS > hosted on fyodor/Abulafia for now). Would we want any reverse DNS > mappings beyond these?
Every physical host should have a reverse DNS entry IMHO. I'd also suggest picking hostnames for all IP addresses in our block so that this setup only has to be done once. If needed, they can be changed later on. <<CDC _______________________________________________ HCoop-SysAdmin mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-sysadmin
