From the discussion in this thread, it seems like we want to add deleuze, mire, and baltar reverse DNS entries on Peer 1's servers. The form to set reverse DNS mappings on Peer 1's customer portal wants contact information for a person responsible. Since I'm not planning to do any such sysadminy stuff, I would guess that the appropriate person is cclausen, who is currently listed as in charge of BIND on the TaskDistribution wiki page.
cclausen, any objection to being in charge of keeping Peer 1 up-to-date on reverse mappings? If not, I can communicate the Peer 1 authentication information to you over one of our servers so that you can submit the first request. Adam Chlipala wrote: > How do y'all think we should handle reverse DNS for our new servers? We > can have Peer 1's servers handle the requests by giving them the > individual mappings, or we can ask for a delegation to our DNS servers. > Acting alone, I would choose the first option now, because we don't > expect to change the mappings often, and why _not_ get their servers to > handle the traffic, right? > > In any case, let me see if I've correctly understood which IP addresses > deserve reverse-resolvable names. We have deleuze (main server), mire > (member dynamic content server), and baltar (switch), each of which > already has a hcoop.net forward mapping (with DNS hosted on > fyodor/Abulafia for now). Would we want any reverse DNS mappings beyond > these? > _______________________________________________ HCoop-SysAdmin mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-sysadmin
