> Graham Freeman wrote: >> On 09 Apr 07, at 04:58, Davor Ocelic wrote: >> >> >>> Yes. I assume that our members base is agreeing that I copy >>> complete Fyodor user and some of system data to one of my >>> hosts for the purpose of an emergency backup copy. >>> >>> I will , of course, not use that backup for any purpose other >>> than eventual HCoop data recovery, and I will delete it from my >>> server once Fyodor's disk is replaced and RAID1-synced to the >>> existing disk in there. >>> >>> Cya, >>> -doc >>> >> >> >> What's your plan for restoring data? Many home/small-office internet >> connections have a much slower upload speed than download speed, so >> restoring data could easily take 8 times as long as backing it up. >> On the other hand, a connection at a university or other large entity >> is going to be just as fast either way. >> >> That's not to say it's not worth doing the backup as you describe - I >> think it is - but it'd be good to know if there's a significant >> upload speed limitation. >> >> Graham >> >> >> > > Can't we just rsync it to Peer 1? I was thinking something along the > lines of rsync -Cavz .... whatever other parameters we need. Even > rsnapshot should work over to the Peer 1 configuration. This wouldn't > face the asymetric bandwidth problem that Graham noted. Maybe mire or > deleuze has some space that we can use until we start the migration? > > Justin
The connection between Interserver and Peer1 is also superb--Interserver is just over the river and their network peers with Peer1's a few blocks from where I am now, <2ms pings. That may not be a bad idea. -ntk _______________________________________________ HCoop-SysAdmin mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-sysadmin
