I agree, that’s why I was checking in to see if there was a sub parcel you had identified as being involved in response inhibition from your tasks, such as flanker. There is a lot of background of IFG being involved in response inhibition, particularly on go/nogo tasks,, so I was wondering if you had any information on specifically where within your parcellation that may be most relevant.
On Sep 27, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Harms, Michael <mha...@wustl.edu<mailto:mha...@wustl.edu>> wrote: Just a reminder to be careful here to avoid issues of circularity/double-dipping. You indicated that you had a priori hypotheses about IFG involvement, but that doesn’t allow you to then select a particular IFG parcel based on your task activation map. Ideally, you would have selected your parcel(s) for analysis prior to ever computing/viewing your activation map (unless what you showed was a map from an independent, unrelated set of subjects). _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
