There is a typo in the CMake test call - it should be using the "latest" 
version of the hdf5 file. This will be fixed in the next release of 1.10.

Allen

On Tuesday, June 07, 2016 04:16:51 PM Roger Leigh wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> I'm looking at the preliminary work needed to add HDF5 to our project
> builds, but encountered a few errors which I was hoping someone might be
> able to provide pointers or suggestions for.
> 
> Logs are here:
> https://gist.github.com/rleigh-dundee/1337ed94f446ba7afc3e1a7a94da6f44
> 
> On Linux (Ubuntu 16.04) and MacOS X (10.11 with latest Xcode), I get a
> single test failure.  In both cases, I built with CMake (Unix Makefiles
> on Ubuntu, Ninja on MacOS X, to make sure it wasn't a generator-specific
> bug), and I didn't specify any hdf5-specific configuration options, just
> the install prefix:
> 
>              Start 632: H5CLEAR-clear_open_chk-latest_log_v3_F
> 
>      632: Test command:
> /Users/rleigh/code/ome-cmake-superbuild/h/hdf5-build/bin/clear_open_chk
> "h5clear_log_v3.h5"
>      632: Test timeout computed to be: 600
>      632/2317 Test #632: H5CLEAR-clear_open_chk-latest_log_v3_F
> 
> This doesn't look platform- or compiler-specific since it fails in
> exactly the same way on both.  Is this a known issue?
> 
> On Windows with CMake/Ninja, I get
> 
>      [4/1416] Running utility command for h5watch-files
>      FAILED: cmd.exe /C "cd /D
> V:\ome-cmake-superbuild\b\hdf5-build\hl\tools\h5watch && "C:\Program
> Files (x86)\CMake\bin\cmake.exe" -E copy_if_different
> V:/ome-cmake-superbuild/b/hdf5-source/hl/tools/testfiles/w-help1.ddl
> V:/ome-cmake-superbuild/b/hdf5-build/hl/tools/h5watch/testfiles/w-help1.ddl
> && ...
>      [ elided 10 kilobytes of commands! ]
>      ..."C:\Program Files (x86)\CMake\bin\cmake.exe" -E
> copy_if_different
> V:/ome-cmake-superbuild/b/hdf5-source/hl/tools/testfiles/w-ext-two-width.ddl
> V:/ome-cmake-superbuild/b/hdf5-build/hl/tools/h5watch/testfiles/w-ext-two-w
> idth.ddl" The command line is too long.
> 
> (I also had a similar failure on Linux, but don't have a log for it
> right now.)
> 
> Is the CMake logic here correct?  Or could this be split up into a
> number of separate custom commands/targets which are run separately
> rather than in a single shot which is exceeding the practical limits of
> at least two systems.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Roger Leigh
> 
> --
> Dr Roger Leigh -- Open Microscopy Environment
> Wellcome Trust Centre for Gene Regulation and Expression,
> School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dow Street,
> Dundee DD1 5EH Scotland UK   Tel: (01382) 386364
> 
> The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
> [email protected]
> http://lists.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_lists.hdfgroup.org
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/hdf5


_______________________________________________
Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
[email protected]
http://lists.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_lists.hdfgroup.org
Twitter: https://twitter.com/hdf5

Reply via email to