+1 for Karthik's suggestion. - Tsuyoshi
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Hi devs > > As you might have noticed, we have several classes and methods in them that > are not annotated at all. This is seldom intentional. Avoiding incompatible > changes to all these classes can be considerable baggage. > > I was wondering if we should add an explicit disclaimer in our > compatibility guide that says, "Classes without annotations are to > considered @Private" > > For methods, is it reasonable to say - "Class members without specific > annotations inherit the annotations of the class"? > > Thanks > Karthik -- - Tsuyoshi
